Why is a known toxic substance STILL in vaccines?   Ask your Legislator!
   
 

Flu Vaccine Factoids

Apparently the CDC has a new moto..."A little inaccuracy sometimes saves a ton of explanation." - H. H. Munro (Saki) (1870-1916)

  • Read the Red Flags Article by Dr. Sherri Tenpenny        
    "The Flu Season Campaign Begins"

    August 30, 2004
     

     

  • Probing questions (and answers) for FDA & Congress regarding flu vaccines

    You might find these questions (and answers) thought provoking.  If an investigation endeavored to ask these questions it would lead to some startling conclusions for Congress and the American people.

      1.  Many parents knew in August the vaccines were tainted.  Why did Congress not find out until October?

      2.  Why did the FDA not follow through in August when contamination was confirmed by Chiron?

      3.  If Chiron did “batch” testing on the vaccines, why were ALL 48 million doses contaminated?

      4.  Is a “batch” 48 million? (answer: of course not!  So where are the “batch” test results for each batch?)

      5.  Why was the contamination not identified and addressed earlier?

      6.  Chiron made 50 million doses.  Where are the other two million doses and have the REALLY been tested for
           sterility?  (P.S. they are ALREADY in the United States)

      7.  Did Congress notice those same CONTAMINATED vaccines were "preserved" with THIMEROSAL?

      8.  Did Congress and/or FDA know that Thimerosal is NOT an effective antibacterial and the CDC has KNOWN that
           since at least 1985 (when Dr. Walter Orenstein and colleagues at CDC published a
    n article in Pediatrics
           in February 1985)?
      There are numerous other peer-reviewed, scientific studies confirming this conclusion.

      9.  Does Congress and/or FDA know that studies published as early as 1974 show Thimerosal is "the least effective"
           preservative (
    Antibacterial Efficiency of Mercurials  by A. E. Elkhouly and R. T. Yousef  in the
           Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences in May 1974

    10.  Does Congress know this SAME factory in Liverpool has had numerous contamination problems going back earlier
          than 1999? (The FDA website has several warning letters on file as well)
         
    http://www.iht.com/bin/print.php?file=542448.html and http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/2004-10-10-flu-vaccine_x.htm  

     11. Does Congress know that Aventis Pasteur has also been "red-flagged" for contamination and GMP difficulties?

     12. Has Congress checked to see if some of the "flu" deaths from 2003 were because of contaminated vaccines?
           See the MMWR (
    January 9, 2004/52 (53); 1286-1288) it indicates that YES, some "flu" deaths
           were because of Serratia marcescens and YES, quite a number of those "flu" deaths HAD been vaccinated!

     13.  Did the CDC try to trace it back to see if any deaths were possibly from contaminated vaccines or blow it off
           like they have the toxic levels of mercury in those same vaccines?

    14.  Does Congress know that anti-virals, such as TamiFlu can be used as a preventive measure?
     http://www.cdc.gov/flu/protect/antiviral/pdf/fluantivirals.pdf

    15.  Why aren’t the FDA and CDC encouraging the use of anti-virals (three of them cover A and B strains) instead
     of creating “panic” over the flu vaccine? 
    Answer: “the Recipe” (Strongly recommend reading all 51 slides but particularly 27 – 29)

    16.  Does Congress know how the CDC "calculates" and predicts "flu" deaths and that the actual number is no where near 36,000 as claimed? 257 in 2001 and 753 in 2002 (http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr52/nvsr52_13.pdf )

    17.  Does Congress know that the National Vital Statistics Report shows a very different picture? 257 in 2001 and 753 in 2002 (http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr52/nvsr52_13.pdf see page 16)

    18.  Does Congress know that the National Vital Statistics Report also shows that since 1979 the highest number of
     influenza deaths is 3006?
     (http://www.lungusa.org/atf/cf/%7B7A8D42C2-FCCA-4604-8ADE-7F5D5E762256%7D/PI1.PDF)

    19.  Did Congress, FDA or CDC read the UPI article by Mark Benjamin which appeared in The Washington Times
     (among others) titled
    'Dire' CDC warnings hiked flu shot demand?

    20.  If so, wonder if they have actually viewed the "Recipe" for a successful flu season to see the CDC advocates
     inciting fear and panic in order to force people to get vaccinated and keep profits up for manufacturers?

    21.  Does Congress know that according to the 2003 Chiron annual report the company made $332.4 million in
     sales on flu vaccine alone and had a 53% gross profit?

    22.  Does Congress realize that vaccines are “good” and profitable business and that even insiders admit liability
     issues are not the primary reason for fewer manufacturers?
     New York Times  
    http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/29/business/29inoculate.html

    23.  Has Congress, FDA or CDC questioned WHY 1 in 6 American children (according to CDC and AAP) now suffer from a neurodevelopmental disorders and that the INFLUENZA vaccine contains a known neurotoxin?

    24.  Did Congress, FDA or CDC know that a person would have to weigh 550 lbs to be within the EPA safety guidelines when taking a flu shot which contains 25 mcg of mercury?

    25.  Can Congress, FDA or CDC name any other instance where a health care worker is allowed to inject a known toxic substance into pregnant women, infants, children and senior citizens that EXCEED all regulatory toxicity guidelines?

    26.  Has Congress seen the CDC/NIP "Blueprint for Success" where NIP has outlined 7 priorities?  Wonder if they know that VACCINE SAFETY is #6 (yes, # SIX out of seven)?

    27.  When will Congress FINALLY ask the tough questions regarding vaccine safety?

    28.  Does Congress realize their continued failure to ask the right (albeit difficult) questions gives the appearance they are more concerned with political position, job security and hefty campaign contributions from pharmaceutical companies than addressing what is REALLY happening at the FDA and CDC National Immunization Program?

    29.  Does Congress realize the National Immunization Program WILL collapse if they don't act quickly and properly to restore responsibility, accountability, integrity and credibility to the program because Americans are rapidly losing faith in NIP?

    30.  Does Congress realize that parents have tremendous respect for Congressmen Weldon & Burton and Congresswomen Maloney & Watson (along with the other 46 House members who have co-sponsored HR 4169) for their leadership in trying to make vaccines safer for our children?

    31.  How many more debacles will it take for the remaining members of Congress who have NOT supported HR 4169 to be embarrassed enough to get their head out of the sand and their hands out of the pharmaceutical
    companies pockets long enough to protect Americans from this travesty before the FDA and CDC lose ALL
    credibility? 

    32.  Does Congress understand that parents are SO disgusted with the lack of response from our “leaders” regarding concerns for our children’s health and safety that MOST, if not all, are willing to abandon ALL party loyalty and VOTE for the candidate who will commit to fixing what is terribly broken within FDA and CDC/NIP? 

    33.  Why does Congress not understand they would not have to try so hard to KEEP their job if they would finally start DOING their job?  

    If they are ready to ask the questions, we can help them with the answers.  A good place to start is by insisting that SAFETY be made priority #1!  We are not “anti-vaccine” but safety issues should not be ignored or minimized by government officials OR the media.

    Sincerely,

    Lujene G. Clark
    lujene@NoMercury.org


    Alan D. Clark, M.D.
    aclark@NoMercury.org

     

     

     





     

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 




The material in this website is made available without profit for research and educational purposes only. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this website for purposes that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.  For more information regarding US Code TITLE 17 ; CHAPTER 1 ; Sec. 107. also known as the 'fair use' copyright go to: http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html  or http://oregon.uoregon.edu/~csundt/documents.htm.



The information on this site is not meant to provide medical or legal advice.  The information provided herein is believed to be true and correct in all respects, however, no representations are made as to information provided by other sources, or information provided by linked websites.  In the event that you have legal or medical questions related to mercury, mercury exposure and/or injury caused by mercury exposure, you should contact an attorney or a qualified medical professional.

 


Print this Page

Add to Favorites


Share your concerns with
 your State Legislators
Share your concerns with Congress in Washington, DC

 

Maryland HB 86


On January 13, 2005
   Maryland Delegate
 Terry R. Gilleland, Jr.
sponsored a bill to ban mercury in vaccines in Maryland


Click here to contact
 
Delegate Gilleland

 

  Missouri SB 49 & SB 74


On December 1, 2004
 Missouri State Senators
 Jason Crowell and
 Norma Champion filed
 bills to ban mercury in vaccines in Missouri

Click here to contact
 Senator Norma Champion


Click here to contact
Senator Jason Crowell


 

Missouri HB 131


On December 22, 2004
 Missouri State Representative
 Robert Schaaf, M.D. filed
a bill to ban mercury in vaccines in Missouri

Click here to contact
Rep. Rob Schaaf, M.D.



 

 Nebraska LB 1158


HAS BEEN RE-INTRODUCED
IN THE 2005 SESSION!


State Senator David M. Landis has sponsored a bill to ban mercury in vaccines in Nebraska. 


 Click here to contact Senator David M. Landis

 

New York A11263



State Assemblyman Harvey Weisenberg (D-Long Beach) has sponsored a bill to ban mercury in vaccines in New York. 


 Click here to contact Assemblyman Weisenberg



 

 OHIO



  Ohio Senator Teresa Fedor, Minority Whip, has asked us to announce that she will introduce a bill to ban mercury in vaccines in Ohio by February 1, 2005 


 Click here to contact Senator Teresa Fedor's office

 

Pennsylvania HB 2863



On September 28, 2004
 State Representative Jeff Habay  (R-Allegheny County) sponsored a bill to ban mercury in vaccines in Pennsylvania.

Click here to contact Representative Habay



 

Washington SB 5305


On January 19, 2005
 State Senators Rasmussen, Benton, Roach, Swecker, Zarelli, Regala, Stevens, Shin, Delvin, Franklin and Mulliken sponsored a bill to ban mercury in vaccines in Washington


Click here to contact
Senator Marilyn Rasmussen

 

 

California AB 2943

 

 On September 28, 2004, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger signed
AB 2943 into law!

On, August 26, 2004
AB 2943 was given final approval on a bi-partisan vote of 48-21 in the California Assembly.

On August 24, 2004  AB 2943 passed the California State Senate  22-13.

State Assemblymember Fran Pavley (D-41st) has sponsored a bill to ban mercury in vaccines in California for pregnant women and children under the age of three.


 Click here to contact Assembly member Pavley




 

Iowa SF 2209


On Friday, May 14, 2004, Iowa Governor Tom Vilsack signed
SF 2209 into law. 


State Senator Ken Veenstra has sponsored a bill to ban mercury in vaccines in Iowa which passed the Iowa Senate 30 to 19 on March 23, 2004.

  Click here to contact Senator Ken Veenstra

State Representative Dan Boddicker, chairman of the Committee on Human Resources announced that SF 2209 received a DO PASS in committee.

Click here to contact Representative Boddicker


 

Is your State listed?

If your State is not listed here but has pending legislation please
contact us. 

 We will be happy to post the appropriate information


 

Is your State next?


If you want to help ban this known neurotoxin in your State please

contact us. 

We will be happy to help make your State
mercury-free!


 




Download the Flash Player.

 

 Copyright 2005  NoMercury.org | Link to Privacy Policy and other statements